Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P9X79 PRO  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '16 at 08:49
Run Duration334 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 96.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 256
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 763
77% 623 Pts
64-Core 892
55% 892 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 21.19.134.1
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Lighting 66
Reflection 57.7
Parallax 84.7
54% 69.4 fps
MRender 61
Gravity 60.4
Splatting 77.7
56% 66.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
672GB free
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 523
Write 406
Mixed 425
100% 451 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 37.3
171% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 139
156% 267 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 112%
Great: 133%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0174 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,526
Write 782
Mixed 891
235% 1,066 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 39.3
206% 92 MB/s
DQ Read 613
DQ Write 481
DQ Mixed 228
257% 441 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 194%
Great: 230%
WDC WD10 EARS-00Y5B1 1TB
931GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
5.54% Terrible
Read 9.3
Write 18.6
Mixed 59.2
44% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.004
4K Write 0.04
4K Mixed 0.002
2% 0.02 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.54%
Great: 43%
FUJITSU MHZ2320BH G2 320GB
298GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.2% Poor
Read 56.8
Write 58
Mixed 23.8
56% 46.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.29
69% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 26%
ST380815 AS 80GB
74GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30% Poor
Read 69.2
Write 69.4
Mixed 11.9
59% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.32
65% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
65.5% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 22
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 14.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 53.7
75% 53.7 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $942
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback