HP ProBook 440 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP ProBook 440 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2247
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151126
Uptime2 Days
Run DateSep 19 '16 at 02:48
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Memory 79
1-Core 49.8
2-Core 91.8
48% 73.5 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 134
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 133
8% 133 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 2247) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4268
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.74% Terrible
Lighting 4.13
Reflection 5.69
Parallax 5.72
3% 5.18 fps
MRender 7.05
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 6.87
4% 5.32 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.74%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01.6 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 470
Write 253
Mixed 270
73% 331 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 28.5
4K Mixed 7.15
55% 18.6 MB/s
DQ Read 23.1
DQ Write 17.2
DQ Mixed 6.69
9% 15.7 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 91%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 250GB
233GB free, PID 50a0
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 237
Write 225
Mixed 234
299% 232 MB/s
4K Read 13.2
4K Write 18.4
4K Mixed 8.2
953% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 16.4
DQ Write 28.3
DQ Mixed 8.81
1,322% 17.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 143%
Great: 146%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.7% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.8
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 13.4
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 440 G2 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 440 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback