Gigabyte GA-X99-SOC Force-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-SOC Force-CF  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 22 '19 at 08:19
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
45.4% Average
Memory 71.4
1-Core 32.3
2-Core 63.7
38% 55.8 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 194
18% 151 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 399.24
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
58.7% Above average
Lighting 49.9
Reflection 64.6
Parallax 135
41% 83.3 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 126
Splatting 107
94% 115 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
453GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN163 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 532 662 635 663 737 617 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 849
Write 956
Mixed 788
SusWrite 641
182% 808 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 44.6
4K Mixed 37.5
125% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 211
155% 206 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 121%
Great: 355%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
544GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 167 163 163 168 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 159
Mixed 92.5
SusWrite 162
107% 145 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 101%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
712GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 7.4 1.6 0.3 11 0.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 114
Write 96.3
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 3.6
56% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0
56% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 107 105 85 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
69% Good
Read 137
Write 132
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 103
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M4A2400C14 CMK16GX4M4A2400C16 CMK16GX4M4A2400C14 CMK16GX4M4A2400C16 CMK16GX4M4A2400C14 CMK16GX4M4A2400C16 CMK16GX4M4A2400C14 CMK16GX4M4A2400C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
54% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 24
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 9.1
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-SOC Force-CF Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-SOC Force-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $368
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback