PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | EVGA Classified SR-2 (all builds) |
Memory | 36.9 GB free of 40 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130424 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 20 '19 at 16:25 |
Run Duration | 163 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5680
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
|
84.5%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 36E1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1774 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 120 121 120 120 121 MB/s
|
63.1%
Good
|
|||
Ct120bx3 0 120GB
55GB free
Firmware: M2CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 118 118 119 118 MB/s
|
58.2%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56901stBench 72%, 2,873 samples | 14x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56801stBench 71%, 2,389 samples | 5x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
R9 Fury-XAMD $781Bench 59%, 8,241 samples | 6x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 5x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 16% - Very poor | Total price: $922 |