TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell Inspiron 14-3467

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.25% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Inspiron 14-3467  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 09D1DR
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180531
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateMay 20 '19 at 06:47
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6006U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
43% Average
Memory 68.8
1-Core 43.9
2-Core 63
40% 58.6 Pts
4-Core 99.3
8-Core 116
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 43%
 Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Dell(1028 078A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.25% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 7.42
Parallax 5.84
5% 6.29 fps
MRender 6.33
Gravity 4.93
Splatting 11.4
7% 7.55 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 5.25%
 Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 50 115 2.8 9.9 44 MB/s
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.8% Average
Read 285
Write 102
Mixed 270
SusWrite 48.1
39% 176 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 19.1
84% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 135
130% 200 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 49.8%
 Great: 85%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$55
671GB free
Firmware: AX0P3D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 85 85 84 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 81.5
Write 78.8
Mixed 29
SusWrite 84.3
50% 68.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 47.6%
 Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 802C0000802C 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.8% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.4
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 11.8
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 50.8%
 Great: 70%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Inspiron 14-3467 Builds (Compare 544 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Inspiron 14-3467

CPU
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples297x
Core i3-6006UIntelBench 36%, 47,111 samples147x
Core i3-7020UIntelBench 40%, 28,454 samples45x
GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples347x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples143x
HD Graphics 620IntelBench 4%, 8,599 samples45x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples39x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples25x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples13x
RAM
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GBUnknownBench 33%, 8,561 samples81x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBUnknownBench 37%, 41,676 samples45x
AO1P24HC8T1-BSFS 1x8GBAdataBench 36%, 6,338 samples27x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback