Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '19 at 17:28
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 71
2-Core 124
59% 94.1 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 396
39% 318 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.4.3
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.1% Below average
Lighting 41.6
Reflection 27.9
Parallax 56
34% 41.8 fps
MRender 26.8
Gravity 42.9
Splatting 34.6
29% 34.8 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$44
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 365 377 379 389 391 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 461
Write 380
Mixed 408
SusWrite 376
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 67.2
4K Mixed 42.2
137% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 228
176% 239 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 125%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
50GB free
Firmware: 0117
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 227 230 231 173 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 252
Write 227
Mixed 214
SusWrite 199
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 2.8
23% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 70
DQ Write 62.6
DQ Mixed 65.5
49% 66 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
491GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 165 164 165 168 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
91% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 124
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 163
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
691GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 109 109 110 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 63
Write 56.5
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 109
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 68%
WD Elements 25A3 2TB
263GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 80 81 80 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 114
Write 107
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 80
128% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
116% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.7% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 14.5
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 11.5
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $581
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback