Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics86.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AX370-Gaming K5
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 18 '19 at 20:20
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.95 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Memory 84.9
85% 84.9 Pts
Poor: 59% Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1650 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.5.1
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.3% Excellent
Lighting 99.2
Reflection 91.8
Parallax 186
81% 126 fps
MRender 90.4
Gravity 126
Splatting 131
97% 116 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM21.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 154 15 186 33 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Read 407
Write 202
Mixed 307
SusWrite 114
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 26.8
128% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 148
146% 229 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 94%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
239GB free
Firmware: GG2OACY0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.1 5.2 5.2 5.3 5.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,266
Write 4.7
SusWrite 5.1
542% 759 MB/s
4K Read 304
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
12,740% 102 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 58%
Hitachi HUA721075KLA330 750GB
624GB free
Firmware: GK8OA9N1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 83 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 76.2
Write 86
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 82.7
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TL48G32S8KSRGB16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 46.5
MC Write 44.2
MC Mixed 42.5
127% 44.4 GB/s
SC Read 29.5
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 37.5
105% 36.8 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 122%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF Builds (Compare 617 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $601
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback