Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 55% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3337U 33,616 User benchmarks, average bench 47% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	55.3% Above average	Memory 81.8 1-Core 70.9 2-Core 123 57% 91.8 Pts	4-Core 170 8-Core 170 23% 170 Pts	64-Core 171 11% 171 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 55.3% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 124D) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.55% Terrible	Lighting 3.93 Reflection 4 Parallax 2.75 3% 3.56 fps	MRender 4.86 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 7.48 4% 4.86 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.55% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 47 38 36 37 36 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	52.5% Above average	Read 250 Write 232 Mixed 212 SusWrite 68.1 43% 190 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 39.3 4K Mixed 29 94% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 173 137% 190 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 118%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 63GB free Firmware: GG2OA6C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 56 56 56 56 55 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Read 62.5 Write 54 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 54.9 36% 49.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron MT8KTF51264HZ-1G6 Elpida EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 8GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	45.5% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.1 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 11.4 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	658x
GeForce GT 720MNvidiaBench 4%, 4,823 samples	210x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	50x

RAM
EBJ40UG8EFU0 1x4GBElpidaBench 29%, 3,036 samples	94x
MT8KTF51264HZ-1G6 1x4GBMicronBench 29%, 1,972 samples	75x
MT8KTF51264HZ-1G6 Hynix HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 6GBMicronBench 41%, 542 samples	37x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28