Huawei KPL-W0X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHuawei KPL-W0X  (all builds)
MotherboardHUAWEI KPL-W0X-PCB
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 17 '19 at 12:59
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 70.8
1-Core 108
2-Core 220
73% 133 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 552
60% 474 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Device(19E5 3E06) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.5.1
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 13.8
Reflection 14.3
Parallax 18
11% 15.4 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 14.3
Splatting 17.5
12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HAJQ-00000 256GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT2300Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 302 301 309 309 308 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 426
Mixed 395
SusWrite 315
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 38.2
139% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 213
160% 214 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
66.3% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 21.4
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 22.4
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KPL-W0X Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Huawei KPL-W0X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback