Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-450 APU 9,307 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Memory 56.1 1-Core 20.4 2-Core 40.3 28% 38.9 Pts	4-Core 40.3 8-Core 40.8 5% 40.5 Pts	64-Core 40.5 2% 40.5 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15 37,154 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 97GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 214 216 213 216 218 MB/s Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.4% Average	Read 234 Write 200 Mixed 184 SusWrite 215 47% 208 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 32.5 4K Mixed 15.4 62% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 96.1 DQ Write 84.8 DQ Mixed 42.3 45% 74.4 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 86%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 500GB 303 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 325GB free, PID a001 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 29 28 29 30 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 24 Write 23.8 Mixed 22.4 SusWrite 28.8 34% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GB 13,596 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 3.4 MC Mixed 5.4 13% 4.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 4.3 9% 3.27 GB/s	Latency 140 29% 140 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
E-450 APUAMDBench 26%, 9,307 samples	16x
E-350AMDBench 25%, 6,654 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon HD 7400MAMDBench 2%, 4,688 samples	19x
Radeon HD 6470MAMDBench 2%, 4,805 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 41%, 10,285 samples	5x
AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GBAdataBench 25%, 5,119 samples	2x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	2x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16