Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4150T 1,418 User benchmarks, average bench 58% LGA1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 88.3 1-Core 89.3 2-Core 155 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 240 8-Core 242 32% 241 Pts	64-Core 237 15% 237 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 8534) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4444 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	3.5% Terrible	Lighting 3.47 Reflection 6.92 Parallax 4.59 3% 4.99 fps	MRender 6.86 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 7.78 5% 5.66 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.5% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 13 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 59 39 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 6 (F1) Unknown 99 99 151185390	103% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 402 Mixed 414 97% 437 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 78.8 4K Mixed 36.1 150% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 359 DQ Write 257 DQ Mixed 117 139% 244 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 Kingston 99U5469-046.A00LF 8GB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1600, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	49.1% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 14.7 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 14.9 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 69.3 58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	34x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	6x
GeForce 820MNvidiaBench 4%, 9,266 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	9x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	8x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	7x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28