TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 838F
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181109
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 16 '19 at 03:04
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Memory 59.9
1-Core 25.4
2-Core 43.7
31% 43 Pts
4-Core 97.9
8-Core 124
14% 111 Pts
64-Core 131
8% 131 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 38.6%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
HP(103C 838F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6344
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.44% Terrible
Lighting 2.53
Reflection 7.04
Parallax 2.53
2% 4.03 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 5.04
3% 3.74 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 2.44%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA1-8D128-HP 128GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A182
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 140 139 137 144 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 1,006
Write 534
Mixed 582
SusWrite 152
126% 568 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 33.3
112% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 212
164% 228 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 94.9%
 Great: 337%
Kingston SE50S37480G 480GB
295GB free
Firmware: 61AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 206 206 204 201 203 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP24D4S7S8MBP-8 04CD F4-2400C16-8GRS 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.8% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 19
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.6
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 44.8%
 Great: 77%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx Builds (Compare 3,381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples2,406x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples974x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 72%, 1 sample1x
GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples1,373x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples795x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples786x
SSD
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples300x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples276x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples161x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples352x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples311x
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 2,916 samples191x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback