Notebook P775DM3(-G)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics79.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 58% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemNotebook P775DM3(-G)  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P775DM3(-G)
Memory46.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161019
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 15 '19 at 16:40
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 15%
CPU Throttled 58%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
55.4% Above average
Memory 75
1-Core 62.3
2-Core 117
52% 84.8 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 307
31% 251 Pts
64-Core 299
18% 299 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 7706) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.2% Very good
Lighting 90.5
Reflection 132
Parallax 120
74% 114 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 121
Splatting 102
90% 110 fps
Poor: 66%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 765 806 770 683 387 232 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,595
Write 912
Mixed 590
SusWrite 607
205% 926 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 34.7
143% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 372
271% 354 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 160%
Great: 243%
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 480GB-$300
421GB free
Firmware: OC34L5TA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 804 866 887 931 946 941 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 1,070
Write 932
Mixed 498
SusWrite 896
190% 849 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 34
129% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 462
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 103
145% 274 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 153%
Great: 181%
WDC WDS200T2B0A 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 385 392 416 423 428 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 455
Write 422
Mixed 360
SusWrite 401
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 74.7
4K Mixed 36.1
129% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 276
228% 328 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 117%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 120 122 124 123 122 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 24.2
Write 118
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 121
58% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
184% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix GKE160SO102408-2400 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
70.4% Very good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 25
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 16.3
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P775DM3(-G) Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

System: Notebook P775DM3(-G)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $420
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback