Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardAsus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA  (all builds)
Memory17.2 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20160816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '16 at 00:02
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320E-$87
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 115
56% 87.9 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 351
34% 281 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650 Ti Boost-$140
EVGA(3842 3658) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7270
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 26.6
18% 23 fps
MRender 28.2
Gravity 25.6
Splatting 24.1
21% 26 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 452
Write 199
Mixed 280
68% 310 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 49.2
4K Mixed 3.7
62% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 25.1
69% 148 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 78%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
769GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3GH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 117
Write 106
Mixed 116
86% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.27
75% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 74%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
624GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3EA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 120
Write 112
Mixed 105
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.41
101% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. Corsair CMX4GX3M1A1333C9 Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 20GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
44.3% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 14.8
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 904 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $588
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback