Gigabyte GA-H67MA-USB3-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H67MA-USB3-B3  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120326
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateMay 14 '19 at 10:38
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G630-$37
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Memory 82.5
1-Core 66.2
2-Core 126
57% 91.5 Pts
4-Core 123
8-Core 124
16% 123 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9400 GT
Gigabyte(1458 34AB) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.24% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.96
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.22 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 1
Splatting 2.48
2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.24%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
167GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 123 134 148 149 115 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.2% Above average
Read 229
Write 98.2
Mixed 165
SusWrite 130
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 24.7
85% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 192
132% 163 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 124%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 74 92 108 90 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 121
Write 115
Mixed 59
SusWrite 88.6
70% 96 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
169GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 110 110 112 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 131
Write 108
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 110
66% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
144% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
735GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 136 144 144 141 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 168
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 140
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 108%
Intenso USB 3.0 device 4TB
290GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 30 31 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 28.2
Mixed 23
SusWrite 29.8
21% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 100%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 128GB-$51
11GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 58 61 65 60 62 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 159
Write 61.2
Mixed 74.8
SusWrite 60
105% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 46%
Jmicron Corp. 1TB
236GB free, PID 0412
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 155 165 176 161 164 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.7% Good
Read 176
Write 134
Mixed 88
SusWrite 159
182% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
85% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.2% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 12.8
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 12.5
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H67MA-USB3-B3 Builds (Compare 557 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H67MA-USB3-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback