Asus P8H77-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory28GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 28GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H77-V  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 28 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '19 at 19:06
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
79% 138 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 521
58% 455 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Lighting 37.4
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 36.2
30% 34.5 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 40.7
Splatting 35.7
31% 38.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB-$94
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 233 305 301 289 291 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 364
Write 326
Mixed 244
SusWrite 284
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 28.8
101% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 31.9
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 42.8
40% 60.3 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 107%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
900GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 97 99 99 98 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 102
Write 95.5
Mixed 39.2
SusWrite 96.8
61% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 57%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
701GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 97 99 99 98 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 178
Write 187
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 96.9
87% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79%
Great: 107%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 1TB-$50
378GB free
Firmware: CV22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 176 185 184 185 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 172
Mixed 79.7
SusWrite 178
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 105%
Great: 119%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
293GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 110 112 111 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 106
Write 109
Mixed 30
SusWrite 110
64% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 0.7
231% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 88%
Sony Storage Media 16GB
8GB free, PID 09c2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 25 26 26 25 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Read 32.9
Write 25.5
Mixed 13.8
SusWrite 23.5
31% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
33% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 859B BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. Kingston 99U5471-052.A00LF Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 28GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.7% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.3
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-V Builds (Compare 989 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-V - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $566
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback