HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 13 '19 at 18:31
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 194
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 476
51% 404 Pts
64-Core 494
31% 494 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73%
Great: 76%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 339A) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2712
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 4.88
Parallax 2.84
3% 3.84 fps
MRender 5.62
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.57
4% 5.14 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 3%
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 840D) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 352.86
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.95% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 2.92
Parallax 1.84
2% 2.39 fps
MRender 2.86
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 2
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.95%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 240GB-$193
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 502ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 108 106 93 94 86 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.6% Average
Read 284
Write 158
Mixed 197
SusWrite 100
41% 185 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 23.8
80% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 118
95% 132 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
466GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 125 127 127 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 118
Write 76.5
Mixed 65
SusWrite 126
71% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.3% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 13.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 11
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 MT Builds (Compare 1,929 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback