Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	178% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer Razer CH20
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190220
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	May 13 '19 at 03:26
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Memory 89.7 1-Core 44.6 2-Core 165 59% 99.7 Pts	4-Core 124 8-Core 162 18% 143 Pts	64-Core 173 11% 173 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 2002) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6294 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	5.42% Terrible	Lighting 4.5 Reflection 68.1 Parallax 4.38 4% 25.7 fps	MRender 10.9 Gravity 6.47 Splatting 13.8 9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.42% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 614 532 562 568 588 584 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	178% Outstanding	Read 1,220 Write 1,199 Mixed 1,172 SusWrite 574 234% 1,042 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 56.8 185% 66.5 MB/s	DQ Read 836 DQ Write 783 DQ Mixed 728 569% 782 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 178% Great: 296%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	46% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 17.3 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 20.9 SC Mixed 8.9 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 67.7 59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,064x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,072x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	469x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,449x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	598x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	400x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	817x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	249x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,759x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	372x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	290x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16