Asrock Z370 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 204%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 194%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics186% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z370 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181108
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMay 12 '19 at 00:20
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$175
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 99.9
1-Core 172
2-Core 344
111% 205 Pts
4-Core 665
8-Core 1,114
108% 890 Pts
64-Core 1425
88% 1425 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 112%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 4100 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 430.53
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
186% Outstanding
Lighting 266
Reflection 252
Parallax 256
217% 258 fps
MRender 315
Gravity 255
Splatting 153
188% 241 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 186%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$125
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF121C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 560 412 494 241 208 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 904
Write 560
Mixed 651
SusWrite 339
137% 614 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 56.3
212% 84.8 MB/s
DQ Read 503
DQ Write 539
DQ Mixed 464
364% 502 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 145%
Great: 144%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
10GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 508
Write 496
Mixed 399
104% 468 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 69.2
236% 84.3 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 360
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
11GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 508
Write 488
Mixed 377
102% 458 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 66.4
231% 83.6 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 353
268% 362 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 123%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
656GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 405 496 498 498 498 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 491
Mixed 461
SusWrite 479
110% 487 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 65.4
225% 82.7 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 364
274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 136%
Great: 133%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$88
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 109 118 118 118 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 114
Write 113
Mixed 71
SusWrite 116
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4400 C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
143% Outstanding
MC Read 56
MC Write 56.5
MC Mixed 38.5
144% 50.3 GB/s
SC Read 29.7
SC Write 57.9
SC Mixed 45.1
126% 44.2 GB/s
Latency 35.8
112% 35.8 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 143%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 3,411 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock Z370 Extreme4 - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $761
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback