Asus P7P55D-E EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7P55D-E EVO (all builds)
Memory	12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111020
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 11 '19 at 16:24
Run Duration	947 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 K 875-$180 2,354 User benchmarks, average bench 70% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	70.2% Very good	Memory 93.1 1-Core 80.2 2-Core 167 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 394 40% 326 Pts	64-Core 398 25% 398 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Asus(1043 8508) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.64 Performing below potential (57^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49% Average	Lighting 61 Reflection 65.9 Parallax 63.9 50% 63.6 fps	MRender 69.9 Gravity 55.8 Splatting 52.2 48% 59.3 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 256GB 830 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 23 22 22 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 504 Write 27 Mixed 49.8 SusWrite 23.1 32% 151 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 13.3 4K Mixed 9.7 50% 14.4 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 13.7 DQ Mixed 23.5 36% 73.6 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 199%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB 8,129 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 196GB free Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 8 129 132 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Read 128 Write 112 Mixed 53 SusWrite 44.8 62% 84.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.2 215% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 108%
WDC WD16 00AAJS-22PSA0 160GB 7GB free, PID 0c25 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 25 26 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	11% Very poor	Read 30.5 Write 22.5 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 8.5 26% 20.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 77% 0.9 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	41.4% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 13 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 12.2 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 61.8 65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7P55D-E EVO Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E EVO

CPU
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	13x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	7x
Core i7 880IntelBench 71%, 808 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	4x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
GTX 680Nvidia $360Bench 32%, 38,995 samples	2x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x
2TB SSD 2TB3Bench 85%, 1,800 samples	2x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	13x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	7x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $679

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16