Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics83.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive38.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171101
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 11 '19 at 00:09
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 80
2-Core 159
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 516
50% 410 Pts
64-Core 621
38% 621 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 93.9
Parallax 95.5
87% 98.8 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 91.7
Splatting 82.1
75% 93.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 165 141 116 152 44 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 498
Write 291
Mixed 12
SusWrite 165
53% 241 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 3.1
31% 8.23 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 92%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
87GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 297 296 297 296 299 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 477
Mixed 412
SusWrite 313
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 53
176% 60.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 356
268% 360 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 110%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
403GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 22 22 22 22 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 66.7
Write 23.5
Mixed 31
SusWrite 22.5
27% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 70%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25
377GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 129 132 132 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
80% Excellent
Read 148
Write 138
Mixed 68
SusWrite 131
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 80%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 12.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,626 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $438
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback