MSI MS-16R1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 8RD
MotherboardMSI MS-16R1  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 10 '19 at 15:38
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 88.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 243
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 773
71% 593 Pts
64-Core 1,001
62% 1,001 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
MSI(1462 123C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1967
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Lighting 36.5
Reflection 33.3
Parallax 38.7
30% 36.2 fps
MRender 41.5
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 38.2
32% 39 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 511 247 249 238 241 254 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 571
Write 783
Mixed 666
SusWrite 290
130% 578 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 35.7
114% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 700
DQ Write 691
DQ Mixed 456
408% 616 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 107%
Great: 126%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
126GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 54 55 55 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 65.1
Write 58
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 54.7
40% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
169% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 79%
ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB
931GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 36.6
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 34.6
45% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 49%
ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB
64GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.1 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 31.9
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 4.4
31% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.8
182% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 21.4
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 25.2
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16R1 Builds (Compare 1,014 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback