Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics81.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 10 '19 at 14:30
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 97.4
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 194
76% 128 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 387
51% 383 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.64
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 93.5
Parallax 87.3
85% 95.1 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 91.5
Splatting 78.1
74% 92.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
450GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 611 638 644 643 622 624 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
189% Outstanding
Read 750
Write 659
Mixed 663
SusWrite 630
152% 676 MB/s
4K Read 65.5
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 85.4
283% 97.2 MB/s
DQ Read 778
DQ Write 675
DQ Mixed 901
628% 785 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 189%
Great: 340%
OCZ Vector 180 240GB-$160
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 393 430 401 440 403 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 439
Write 485
Mixed 348
SusWrite 412
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 38.8
144% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 286
232% 329 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
465GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 121 122 122 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 178
Write 144
Mixed 85
SusWrite 121
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 34.6
MC Mixed 30.1
93% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 24.3
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 48.6
82% 48.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,792 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $925
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback