Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181204
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 10 '19 at 02:08
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$442
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 257
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 860
79% 661 Pts
64-Core 1,418
88% 1,418 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.39
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.1% Above average
Lighting 70.5
Reflection 61.9
Parallax 51.1
58% 61.2 fps
MRender 68.6
Gravity 54.2
Splatting 62.1
50% 61.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,387
Write 5,197
Mixed 4,704
1,138% 5,096 MB/s
4K Read 458
4K Write 255
4K Mixed 315
1,233% 343 MB/s
DQ Read 1,259
DQ Write 790
DQ Mixed 822
667% 957 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 144 143 143 143 143 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 203
Write 246
Mixed 110
SusWrite 144
129% 176 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
412% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 100%
Great: 118%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296
635GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 127 128 128 128 127 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Read 157
Write 187
Mixed 104
SusWrite 129
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
335% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 118%
Hitachi HDS724040ALE640 4TB-$465
737GB free
Firmware: MJAOA580
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 97 102 102 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
60% Good
Read 109
Write 108
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 99.8
64% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 190 187 190 193 185 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 151
Mixed 83
SusWrite 187
111% 152 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215
740GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 81 80 82 83 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 84.7
Write 77.2
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 81.2
55% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$114
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
64.7% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 20.5
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,513 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $349

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $1,330
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback