TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics95.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsus STRIX H270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '19 at 22:10
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 128
2-Core 254
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 560
63% 494 Pts
64-Core 692
43% 692 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑
This bench: 85.7%
 Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
EVGA(3842 5180) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.7% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 135
Parallax 116
100% 124 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 119
Splatting 97.7
87% 107 fps
Poor: 93% ↑
This bench: 95.7%
 Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB
287GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 504 326 212 256 184 207 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 1011
Write 737
Mixed 496
SusWrite 282
140% 632 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 39.5
146% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 221
183% 261 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑
This bench: 115%
 Great: 182%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 148 151 147 147 150 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 48.8
Write 86.2
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 148
62% 84.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.4
170% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 56.7%
 Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$299
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 26.1
86% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 30.3
SC Mixed 25.4
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 84.1%
 Great: 91%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,827 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $250

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel  $247Bench 84%, 712,312 samples483x
Core i7-7700Intel  $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples424x
Core i5-7500Intel  $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples192x
GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples207x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples197x
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples153x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples74x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples70x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples53x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples69x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples62x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair  $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples46x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $758
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback