HP Presario CQ62 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Presario CQ62 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1425
Memory1 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100520
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 08 '19 at 14:56
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU 75%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium P6000
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
27.4% Poor
Memory 46.9
1-Core 33.8
2-Core 50.8
29% 43.8 Pts
4-Core 44.9
8-Core 62.5
7% 53.7 Pts
64-Core 74.9
5% 74.9 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
HP(103C 1425) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.63% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 0.88
Parallax 0.62
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 1.05
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.26
1% 0.94 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.63%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 192 194 202 185 202 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.5% Below average
Read 148
Write 86.7
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 191
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 15.9
4K Mixed 8.6
36% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 113
92% 130 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4JSF12864HZ-1G4D1 Hynix HMT125S6TFR8C-G7 3GB
1067, 1067 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.4% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.97 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 1.4
7% 2.5 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Presario CQ62 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: HP Presario CQ62 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 17% - Very poor Total price: $15
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback