TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GL62 7RD
MotherboardMSI MS-16J9  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '19 at 14:14
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 111
2-Core 210
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 399
53% 398 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 79.6%
 Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 11C8) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Lighting 31.3
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 29.8
26% 28.6 fps
MRender 35.2
Gravity 30.5
Splatting 22.5
23% 29.4 fps
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 24.8%
 Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ128G8NY 128GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYXA0101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3902
Write 61.7
Mixed 121
283% 1,362 MB/s
4K Read 474
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 7.6
730% 162 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 94%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
34GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,629
Write 48
Mixed 88
900% 1,255 MB/s
4K Read 485
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.7
20,524% 163 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 04CD F4-2400C16-16GRS 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 23.7
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.3
68% 23.9 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 78.9%
 Great: 79%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,784 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples2,480x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples1,304x
GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples2,256x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples1,024x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples503x
SSD
THNSNJ256G8NY 256GBToshibaBench 76%, 12,683 samples211x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 11,069 samples127x
THNSNJ128G8NY 128GBToshibaBench 73%, 7,789 samples110x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples764x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples310x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples215x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback