Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80Q7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemLenovo 80Q7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Paris 5A8
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150813
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateSep 13 '16 at 12:10
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 94.6
2-Core 186
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 265
36% 265 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 3809) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4256
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.38% Terrible
Lighting 6.67
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 5.84
5% 7.66 fps
MRender 7.81
Gravity 6.17
Splatting 14.3
8% 9.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.38%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 240GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSBG200 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Read 474
Write 339
Mixed 241
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 67.3
4K Mixed 38.9
121% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 84.3
92% 154 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 90%
Innostor IS888 USB bridge 500GB
414GB free, PID 0888
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 115
Write 104
Mixed 97.3
133% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 5.47
4K Mixed 0.48
205% 2.16 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.5% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.5
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 18.3
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80Q7 Builds (Compare 746 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80Q7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback