Asrock H87M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H87M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '16 at 03:05
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4150-$38
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 93.3
1-Core 102
2-Core 169
73% 121 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 258
34% 253 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
ASRock(1849 041E) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3186
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.69% Terrible
Lighting 3.57
Reflection 5.46
Parallax 3.84
3% 4.29 fps
MRender 8.62
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 7.78
5% 6.26 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.69%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 499
Write 352
Mixed 329
87% 393 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 21.3
146% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 48.3
DQ Write 90.5
DQ Mixed 21.3
30% 53.4 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1AQ1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 117
Write 137
Mixed 128
96% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 2.54
4K Mixed 0.45
122% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 72%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
344GB free
Firmware: MX6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 102
Write 98.7
Mixed 74.9
69% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.22
87% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 107%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
286GB free
Firmware: 51.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 70.1
Write 75
Mixed 57.8
51% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.15
77% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 63%
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power32G 32GB
29GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
35.5% Below average
Read 123
Write 47.7
Mixed 66.8
88% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.05
128% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60.5% Good
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18.7
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 19.9
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H87M Pro4 Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H87M Pro4 - $151

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $404
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback