TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics95.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive58.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181206
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMay 06 '19 at 14:18
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 83.6
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 962
85% 722 Pts
64-Core 1,323
82% 1,323 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑
This bench: 86.8%
 Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3362)
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.53
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.7% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 149
Parallax 127
114% 138 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 137
Splatting 1
61% 84.4 fps
Poor: 93% ↑
This bench: 95.7%
 Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 26 40 99 78 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 416
Write 121
Mixed 43.3
SusWrite 76.7
36% 164 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 93.3
4K Mixed 18.8
98% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 27
60% 124 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 58.1%
 Great: 86%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
621GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 192 190 195 195 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 75.2
Mixed 81
SusWrite 191
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 107%
 Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 45.1
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 34
113% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 26.4
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 31.4
95% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 109%
 Great: 110%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD  $235Bench 72%, 30,050 samples97x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD  $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD  $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples59x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples58x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples29x
SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $140Bench 213%, 165,668 samples21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung  $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples17x
RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL  $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $32Bench 84%, 287,720 samples18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples11x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $826
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback