Mecer Extreme

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics64.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMecer Extreme  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ57TM
Memory9.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111207
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '19 at 11:58
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 661-$80
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 73.3
1-Core 89
2-Core 157
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 217
29% 218 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
64.1% Good
Lighting 81.4
Reflection 83.9
Parallax 82.6
66% 82.6 fps
MRender 80.9
Gravity 74.7
Splatting 66.7
60% 74.1 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ VERTEX3 60GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 19 22 14 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 44% Great: 70%
StoreJet Transcend 3TB
319GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 24 24 22 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 24.6
Write 16.3
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 23.6
27% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-015.A00LF Adata Corsair CM3X2G1600C9 Corsair CM3X2G1600C9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.1% Below average
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 12.5
30% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8.3
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Extreme Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Mecer Extreme

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback