Asus P5QPL-AM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5QPL-AM  (all builds)
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100622
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '19 at 08:19
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5430
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 38.2
2-Core 76.3
42% 62.5 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 152
20% 151 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5750
PwrHis(1787 2287) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
9.24% Terrible
Lighting 12
Reflection 9.54
Parallax 11.2
10% 10.9 fps
MRender 9.81
Gravity 8.53
Splatting 11
8% 9.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.24%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
257GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 69 76 70 73 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 74.1
Write 71.1
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 70.6
47% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 43%
Seagate ST32000641AS 1TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 63 70 76 67 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 24.3
Write 31.9
Mixed 31
SusWrite 69.9
29% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
22% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 6.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5QPL-AM Builds (Compare 187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QPL-AM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback