Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics90.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte AX370-Gaming K5
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190116
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateMay 06 '19 at 04:04
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 112
2-Core 228
75% 138 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 711
72% 582 Pts
64-Core 1,240
77% 1,240 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.1% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 122
Parallax 114
94% 117 fps
MRender 91.1
Gravity 113
Splatting 97.6
82% 101 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,445
Write 2,232
Mixed 1,769
478% 2,149 MB/s
4K Read 58.3
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 74.9
246% 83.4 MB/s
DQ Read 912
DQ Write 697
DQ Mixed 863
629% 824 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Toshiba Q Series Pro 256GB-$109
59GB free
Firmware: JTRA0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 459 459 460 459 258 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 460
Mixed 443
SusWrite 426
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 39.8
125% 45.2 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 330
249% 334 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 107%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
45GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 164 33 134 30 96 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.9% Poor
Read 172
Write 95.2
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 109
26% 115 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 19.4
4K Mixed 10.7
45% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 14.3
DQ Write 15.4
DQ Mixed 14.4
11% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
72GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 92 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 171
Write 161
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 92.1
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
622GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 183 185 184 184 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 170
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 183
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMR16GX4M2D3000C16 CMR16GX4M2C3000C16 CMR16GX4M2D3000C16 CMR16GX4M2C3000C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.8% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 11.8
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF Builds (Compare 616 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $598
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback