Asus P8H61-M LX R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive37.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120530
Uptime22.6 Days
Run DateMay 05 '19 at 21:50
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G630-$37
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 84.3
1-Core 71.3
2-Core 141
60% 99 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 139
19% 140 Pts
64-Core 138
9% 138 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Gigabyte(1458 353E) 2GB
CLim: 941 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
7.58% Terrible
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 8.08
Parallax 9.34
7% 8.71 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 11.1
8% 10.3 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.58%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 67 66 58 62 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 128
Write 116
Mixed 148
SusWrite 64.3
26% 114 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 25.1
84% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 27.5
DQ Write 84
DQ Mixed 32.8
32% 48.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 73%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
406GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 128 130 131 130 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 129
Write 126
Mixed 52
SusWrite 128
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5474-010.A00LF 9905402-532.A00LF 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.7% Below average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 9.5
28% 10 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LX R2.0 Builds (Compare 970 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback