Wortmann TERRA Server

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemWortmann TERRA Server  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel S5520HC
Memory20.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140929
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 04 '19 at 21:52
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5649
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 144
62% 102 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 405
42% 336 Pts
64-Core 958
59% 958 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$79
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 324
Write 236
Mixed 246
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 18.1
61% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 146
125% 183 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 91%
ST8000VN 0022-2EL112 8TB
4.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 157
Write 127
Mixed 97.8
155% 127 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 77%
JMicron Generic DISK02 1.5TB
354GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 84.2
Write 44.3
Mixed 41.4
64% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 39%
ST8000VN 0022-2EL112 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 161
Write 127
Mixed 110
163% 133 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 5.87 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 77%
JMicron Generic DISK00 1.5TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 96.6
Write 103
Mixed 51.9
104% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 42%
JMicron Generic DISK03 1.5TB
292GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 85.5
Write 92.5
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 0.1
67% 54.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 46%
ST5000VN 0001-1SF17X 5TB
744GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0.1 0 0 0.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.2% Below average
Read 148
Write 119
Mixed 69
SusWrite 0.1
100% 84 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
135% 1.77 MB/s
JMicron Generic DISK01 1.5TB
354GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 40 38 39 40 40 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 87
Write 95.7
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 38.3
86% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 37%
JMicron Generic DISK04 1.5TB
286GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.7% Very poor
Read 63.6
Write 72.6
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 0
61% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
74% 0.9 MB/s
ST4000VN 0001-1SF178 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 36 38 36 36 36 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.5% Average
Read 162
Write 123
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 37.4
121% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
134% 1.73 MB/s
SAMSUNG HD203WI 2TB
733GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 36 38 36 36 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 78.5
Write 103
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 37.7
84% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12x2GB
12 of 12 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.8% Average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 17.5
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TERRA Server Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Wortmann TERRA Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback