Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3647h
Memory	13.4 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091022
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	May 04 '19 at 18:56
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Memory 65.3 1-Core 42.5 2-Core 82.3 41% 63.4 Pts	4-Core 81.2 8-Core 68.7 10% 74.9 Pts	64-Core 57.3 4% 57.3 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 8422) 2GB CLim: 1372 MHz, MLim: 1537 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	20.7% Poor	Lighting 21.7 Reflection 25.9 Parallax 29.5 18% 25.7 fps	MRender 36.3 Gravity 33.4 Splatting 28.9 26% 32.9 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 204 231 239 242 234 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.5% Above average	Read 241 Write 237 Mixed 200 SusWrite 213 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 48.1 4K Mixed 25.3 89% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 123 110% 167 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 116%
Hitachi HCS5C2020ALA632 2TB 1,802 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1.5TB free Firmware: ML6OA800 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 123 122 123 123 123 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 124 Write 122 Mixed 64.2 SusWrite 120 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 75%
WD Elements 10B8 500GB 1,821 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 463GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 32 33 33 34 33 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	Read 39.5 Write 33 Mixed 26.9 SusWrite 32.1 44% 32.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 97% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5273EB0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B5273EB0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B5273DH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B5273DH0-CK0 52GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 5.9 18% 6.27 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 0.9 SC Mixed 2.3 7% 2.57 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	98x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	50x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	29x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	70x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	30x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
RTOTJ128VGD2EYX 128GBBench 54%, 1,124 samples	5x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $80Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	5x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	7x
ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 22%, 367 samples	7x
ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 540 samples	5x

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $117

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16