Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3647h
Memory	13.6 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091022
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 17 '19 at 07:51
Run Duration	154 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	45.4% Average	Memory 77.5 1-Core 42.9 2-Core 86.6 45% 69 Pts	4-Core 80.5 8-Core 83.2 11% 81.8 Pts	64-Core 79.6 5% 79.6 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Asus(1043 8422) 2GB CLim: 1372 MHz, MLim: 1537 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Lighting 21.1 Reflection 26.3 Parallax 32.9 17% 26.8 fps	MRender 36.3 Gravity 33.5 Splatting 28.7 26% 32.8 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 154GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 211 229 241 240 234 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	63.2% Good	Read 254 Write 243 Mixed 220 SusWrite 213 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 47.8 4K Mixed 29.4 100% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 125 114% 173 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 116%
Hitachi HCS5C2020ALA632 2TB 1,802 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 1.5TB free Firmware: ML6OA800 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 122 123 122 122 121 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	67% Good	Read 115 Write 118 Mixed 67.8 SusWrite 119 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 75%
WD Elements 10B8 500GB 1,821 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 461GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 33 33 34 34 33 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Read 40.1 Write 32.7 Mixed 29.4 SusWrite 32.3 45% 33.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5273EB0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B5273EB0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B5273DH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B5273DH0-CK0 52GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	21.6% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 6.5 20% 6.9 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 5.9 15% 5.37 GB/s	Latency 85.3 47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	98x
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	50x
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	29x

GPU
Q45/Q43 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 16,152 samples	70x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	30x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
RTOTJ128VGD2EYX 128GBBench 54%, 1,124 samples	5x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $62Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	5x

RAM
ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673FH0-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 680 samples	7x
ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 40GBUnknownBench 22%, 367 samples	7x
ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 40GBUnknownBench 25%, 540 samples	5x

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $117

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16