Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics63.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X58A-UD5  (all builds)
Memory19.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110201
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 04 '19 at 08:46
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 78.7
2-Core 144
65% 105 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 335
34% 277 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.2% Good
Lighting 79.7
Reflection 78.9
Parallax 67.9
65% 75.5 fps
MRender 71.3
Gravity 73.2
Splatting 74.6
60% 73 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 4 256GB-$35
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 85 87 87 88 90 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.8% Below average
Read 212
Write 173
Mixed 135
SusWrite 86.4
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 19.5
68% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 18.6
DQ Write 69.6
DQ Mixed 24.8
25% 37.7 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 87%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 2TB-$121
1TB free
Firmware: CV26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 67 67 67 70 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
62% Good
Read 148
Write 132
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 67.7
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
447GB free
Firmware: CC96
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 67 67 67 70 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 53
Write 32.2
Mixed 44
SusWrite 67.7
36% 49.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
185GB free
Firmware: CC1H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 93 95 95 96 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 106
Write 105
Mixed 54
SusWrite 94
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 66%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
548GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 109 109 111 112 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 111
Write 106
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 110
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 74%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
130GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 71 73 72 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 122
Write 123
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 72
70% 94.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24GB
null MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.9% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10.9
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 10.2
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X58A-UD5 Builds (Compare 343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $259
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback