Asrock B360M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B360M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190313
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMay 04 '19 at 02:41
Run Duration536 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$55
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 117
2-Core 210
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 316
42% 317 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
ASRock(1849 3E90) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4939
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
3.84% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 3.81
3% 4.21 fps
MRender 6.95
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 9.74
6% 6.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.84%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 48 41 48 47 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 305
Write 329
Mixed 226
SusWrite 46
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 17
56% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 54.2
DQ Write 46.8
DQ Mixed 31.6
29% 44.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 61%
Seagate Game Drive SSD 500GB
462GB free
Firmware: 0380
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 0.3
0% 0.3 MB/s
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1GB free
Firmware: CC4H
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 68
Write 74.8
Mixed 63.3
52% 68.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
89% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
62GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 102 98 97 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 78.7
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 99.3
64% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 114%
15GB free
Firmware: 0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 48 42 48 47 46 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 46.5
Write 48.7
Mixed 32
SusWrite 45.8
32% 43.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 40%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32
170GB free
Firmware: AM001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 100 100 100 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 86
Write 87.3
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 99.1
56% 76.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 60%
Generic- Compact Flash 1GB
0GB free, PID 0151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 11
Write 9.5
Mixed 9.3
12% 9.93 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
22% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 6%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB
15GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 60
Write 15.5
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 15.6
31% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 1.3
75% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GB-$67
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.1% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 21.1
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 21
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B360M Pro4 - $21

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $378
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback