Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory232GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 232GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus WS-C621E-SAGE Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK WS-C621E-SAGE Series
Memory226.1 GB free of 232 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190411
Uptime2 Days
Run DateMay 03 '19 at 06:22
Run Duration323 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8180
CPU1, 2 CPU, 56 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 56.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 240
74% 139 Pts
4-Core 451
8-Core 892
79% 671 Pts
64-Core 5,757
356% 5,757 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Device(7377 F007) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.3% Below average
Lighting 40.6
Reflection 30.4
Parallax 37
33% 36 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 35.6
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1352 309 309 309 310 310 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,990
Write 1,474
Mixed 1,183
SusWrite 483
285% 1,283 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 59.5
225% 85.4 MB/s
DQ Read 981
DQ Write 1,071
DQ Mixed 1,008
764% 1,020 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 223%
Great: 280%
Teclast 360GB A850 360GB
171GB free
Firmware: V8301c50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 351 351 353 351 357 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 384
Write 353
Mixed 320
SusWrite 350
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 65.5
4K Mixed 27.9
101% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 173
131% 172 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 89%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
47GB free
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 198 201 185 191 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 365
Mixed 288
SusWrite 190
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 39.9
142% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 218
198% 304 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 101%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
473GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 469 470 470 470 471 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 469
Mixed 388
SusWrite 470
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 42.5
168% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 354
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 116%
Great: 122%
XM1441-1AB111024 960GB
961GB free
Firmware: PA00FB05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2011 2008 1997 2000 2019 2004 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 1,324
Write 2,037
Mixed 960
SusWrite 2,007
359% 1,582 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 99.3
4K Mixed 40.1
147% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 1,033
DQ Write 1,229
DQ Mixed 606
602% 956 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 271%
Great: 271%
WD My Passport 25E2 2TB
594GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 36.4
Write 33.9
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 35.9
46% 33.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 18ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 Hynix HMA84GR7AFR4N-UH 18ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 18ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 Hynix HMA84GR7AFR4N-UH 18ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 18ASF2G72PZ-2G3B1 Hynix HMA84GR7AFR4N-UH 18ASF2G72PZ-... 231GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 32767, 16384, 16384, 32767, 16384, 16384, 32767, 16384, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
132% Outstanding
MC Read 50.6
MC Write 67.3
MC Mixed 51.1
161% 56.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 132%
This bench: 132%
Great: 135%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS-C621E-SAGE Series Builds (Compare 151 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 213%
UFO

System: Asus WS-C621E-SAGE Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $1,306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback