Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory14.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20171204
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 02 '19 at 19:38
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 67.1
1-Core 104
2-Core 206
69% 125 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 541
53% 435 Pts
64-Core 531
33% 531 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) 2GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.4.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Lighting 18.9
Reflection 31.5
Parallax 22.6
15% 24.4 fps
MRender 29.6
Gravity 16.5
Splatting 34.8
23% 27 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 299 298 288 289 248 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 469
Mixed 388
SusWrite 304
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 50.3
167% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 239
176% 232 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 101%
Great: 124%
Adata SU650 480GB-$89
182GB free
Firmware: R0831B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 362 8.2 97 7 9.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 502
Write 417
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 103
57% 260 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 0.5
37% 9.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 99%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB
0GB free, PID 1603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.4 4.3 4.3 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
6.28% Terrible
Read 22.5
Write 3.7
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 4.2
9% 8.93 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
33% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.28%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD48G240082 F4-3000C16-8GISB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.2% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 24.9
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 22.1
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,068 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $347
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback