MSI MS-1795

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GE72 6QD
MotherboardMSI MS-1795  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160121
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMay 01 '19 at 11:07
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 191
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 496
52% 418 Pts
64-Core 535
33% 535 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
MSI(1462 115B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4454
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.01% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 6.22
5% 9.98 fps
MRender 8.29
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 13
8% 8.95 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.01%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
307GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 398 396 407 387 361 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 417
Mixed 417
SusWrite 390
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 53
173% 61.7 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 287
233% 329 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 114%
Great: 123%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
614GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 126 127 126 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 139
Write 130
Mixed 26
SusWrite 126
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76%
Great: 75%
LaCie P9237 Desktop 5TB
2.5TB free, PID 1092
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 153 151 154 153 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 106
Write 118
Mixed 29
SusWrite 150
137% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.6
170% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
82% Excellent
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 26.6
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 24.3
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 82%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-1795 Builds (Compare 1,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-1795

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback