Asus Z170-AR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics64.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z170-AR  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160624
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '16 at 13:21
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
88% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 125
2-Core 247
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 699
71% 573 Pts
64-Core 703
44% 703 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 88%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Driver: nvd3dumx Ver. 21.21.13.7270
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.6% Good
Lighting 81.6
Reflection 81.5
Parallax 70
66% 77.7 fps
MRender 72.5
Gravity 74.7
Splatting 75.6
61% 74.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$250
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 2,060
Write 896
Mixed 1,148
300% 1,368 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 53.7
235% 90.3 MB/s
DQ Read 582
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 199
216% 369 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 228%
Great: 243%
Marvell Raid VD 9TB
3TB free
Firmware: MV.R00-0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 390
Write 401
Mixed 296
271% 363 MB/s
4K Read 1.51
4K Write 4.84
4K Mixed 0.38
195% 2.24 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 227%
Great: 287%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128
677GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 112
Write 94.1
Mixed 93.6
75% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.47
121% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 74%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
407GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 106
Write 99
Mixed 79.1
71% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 2.12
4K Mixed 0.45
107% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 76%
NORELSYS 106X 1TB
697GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 155
Write 132
Mixed 141
180% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.34
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.34
115% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 71%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 128GB
18GB free, PID 0095
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 176
Write 46.6
Mixed 122
129% 115 MB/s
4K Read 3.37
4K Write 0.34
4K Mixed 0.2
30% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
85.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 26.8
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 26.5
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 62
64% 62 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170-AR Builds (Compare 1,442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170-AR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $590
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback