EVGA 132-BL-E758

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardEVGA 132-BL-E758  (all builds)
Memory17.7 GB free of 0 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110825
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateJul 02 '16 at 14:02
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
Socket 423, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 65.1
2-Core 130
44% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 344
36% 288 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 46% Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
XFX(1682 3110) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.4
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 14.6
14% 15.2 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 17.4
12% 13.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Marvell Raid VD 9TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: MV.R Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 376
Write 402
Mixed 348
282% 375 MB/s
4K Read 1.26
4K Write 4.87
4K Mixed 0.42
189% 2.18 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 223%
Great: 287%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128
677GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 110
Write 95.5
Mixed 72.3
69% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.17
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.19
105% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 74%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
441GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 93.9
Write 93.2
Mixed 72.1
65% 86.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 2.17
4K Mixed 0.3
106% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 76%
NORELSYS 106X 1TB
493GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
67.6% Good
Read 163
Write 163
Mixed 141
199% 156 MB/s
4K Read 1.25
4K Write 2.61
4K Mixed 0.34
105% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 71%
PNY USB 3.0 FD 128GB
119GB free, PID 0095
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 173
Write 101
Mixed 69
129% 114 MB/s
4K Read 4.03
4K Write 0.19
4K Mixed 0.18
28% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 132-BL-E758 Builds (Compare 146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: EVGA 132-BL-E758

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback