Notebook P65xRP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemNotebook P65xRP  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook P65xRP
Memory20.6 GB free of 32.0156 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160718
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 30 '19 at 06:29
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 182
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 539
54% 438 Pts
64-Core 519
32% 519 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Clevo(1558 6A01) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5018
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6% Terrible
Lighting 6.43
Reflection 69.1
Parallax 6
5% 27.2 fps
MRender 8.76
Gravity 5.37
Splatting 12
8% 8.72 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X400 512GB-$99
311GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4120000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 279 275 270 266 269 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 464
Write 430
Mixed 308
SusWrite 282
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 32
105% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 231
194% 283 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
GigaDevice 25Q Series 859B CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 859B CT16G4SFD8213.C16FAD 80GB
0, 2133, 2133 MHz
49152, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
70% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 27.5
MC Mixed 22.7
72% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 19
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P65xRP Builds (Compare 76 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Notebook P65xRP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $42
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback