Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Memory 58.5 1-Core 86.4 2-Core 165 58% 103 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 597 56% 465 Pts	64-Core 1612 100% 1612 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 321GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 444 443 444 443 443 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 462 Write 450 Mixed 375 SusWrite 445 98% 433 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 72.2 4K Mixed 43.2 140% 48.7 MB/s	DQ Read 336 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 311 241% 328 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 437GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 444 443 444 443 443 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 461 Write 451 Mixed 396 SusWrite 446 99% 438 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 72.5 4K Mixed 43.6 141% 49 MB/s	DQ Read 338 DQ Write 292 DQ Mixed 354 255% 328 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0-CK 8x8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	MC Read 44.5 MC Write 39 MC Mixed 35.9 114% 39.8 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 7.2 25% 8.87 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 100%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 54%

Yacht

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	18x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v21stBench 74%, 880 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 66%, 741 samples	7x

RAM
M393B1G70BH0-CK 4x8GBSamsungBench 59%, 8 samples	3x
M393B1K70CH0-CH 4x8GBSamsungBench 51%, 15 samples	3x
M393B2G70DB0-YK 2x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 4 samples	2x

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $227

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16