Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus Z9PA-D8 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PA-D8 Series
Memory61.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '19 at 03:22
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 61.3
1-Core 85.6
2-Core 168
59% 105 Pts
4-Core 332
8-Core 655
58% 494 Pts
64-Core 1,640
102% 1,640 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 445 448 448 448 448 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 466
Write 453
Mixed 376
SusWrite 450
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 44.7
145% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 313
241% 329 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$76
435GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 449 449 449 448 448 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 477
Mixed 414
SusWrite 451
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 83.6
4K Mixed 52.4
172% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 310
239% 329 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 116%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70QB0-CK 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
92.9% Outstanding
MC Read 44.8
MC Write 36.1
MC Mixed 33.5
109% 38.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.3
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PA-D8 Series Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: Asus Z9PA-D8 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $354
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback