IBM 49Y6512

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardIBM 49Y6512  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100426
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 10 '16 at 02:20
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 66
2-Core 119
50% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 251
8-Core 477
43% 364 Pts
64-Core 1,028
64% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M5015 999GB
199GB free
Firmware: 2.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 292
Mixed 356
277% 369 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 2.75
4K Mixed 2.83
1,556% 11.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 217%
Great: 217%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 146GB
119GB free
Firmware: 2.13
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
82% Excellent
Read 145
Write 141
Mixed 125
103% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.51
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 1.03
203% 1.31 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 82%
Great: 119%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 146GB
110GB free
Firmware: 2.13
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 144
Write 139
Mixed 132
104% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.52
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 1.01
201% 1.29 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 119%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 146GB
77GB free
Firmware: 2.13
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 135
Write 133
Mixed 127
99% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.36
4K Mixed 0.96
194% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 119%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 255GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
214% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 269
Mixed 338
270% 359 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1.38
1,258% 9.56 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
40% Below average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 13.8
43% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 8
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 40%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback