Asus CG8565

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics38.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus CG8565  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG8565
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, ,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121029
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateApr 29 '19 at 15:55
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 96.4
1-Core 113
2-Core 227
83% 145 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 585
61% 491 Pts
64-Core 591
37% 591 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gigabyte(1458 360C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1323 MHz, MLim: 1850 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Lighting 46.3
Reflection 42.4
Parallax 60.3
38% 49.7 fps
MRender 59.4
Gravity 54.1
Splatting 39.8
41% 51.1 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 195 203 211 167 188 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 350
Write 237
Mixed 253
SusWrite 195
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 44.4
144% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 119
92% 126 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 118%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
458GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 103 104 100 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 115
Write 106
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 103
70% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 108%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 250GB
83GB free, PID 61f5
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 267 230 186 220 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 244
Write 238
Mixed 224
SusWrite 215
313% 230 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 31.9
2,677% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 28.9
DQ Write 49.2
DQ Mixed 31.2
2,842% 36.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 224%
Great: 377%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLA302G08-MGJHB 06C1 SLA302G08-MGJHB 029E CML4GX3M1A1600C9 06C1 SLA302G08-MGJHB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 18.4
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 21
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 52.4
76% 52.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CG8565 Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Asus CG8565

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $530
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback