Dell Latitude E5430 non-vPro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Latitude E5430 non-vPro  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0MYF02
Memory6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181130
Uptime11.9 Days
Run DateApr 29 '19 at 04:44
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3340M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 151
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 220
30% 221 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Dell(1028 053C) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
4.01% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 5.92
Parallax 3.41
4% 4.61 fps
MRender 4.95
Gravity 2.53
Splatting 8.52
5% 5.34 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.01%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256MAY-1AH12ABHA 256GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M5T6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 351 347 350 345 347 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 410
Write 381
Mixed 284
SusWrite 348
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 48.8
4K Mixed 28.3
94% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 347
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 226
199% 297 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$40
880GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 107 105 106 108 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
61% Good
Read 106
Write 108
Mixed 56
SusWrite 107
69% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 61%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 14
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 14.7
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 45%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E5430 non-vPro Builds (Compare 529 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E5430 non-vPro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback